Samsung Galaxy S III vs HTC One X vs iPhone 4S vs Nokia Lumia 900

Not even time to be presented and we already have a comparison of the S III with the main top of the range:

Source: Visit

Which smartphone has the best battery?

Giving objective advice is never easy, because, as goals may be, there will always be someone who will dispute the general validity, but one thing right now, we are sure: no one can compete with the Razr Maxx when it comes to autonomy .If so it is obvious that the smartphone is in front of Motorola, who I am, however, his more immediate followers?

In analyzing the ' HTC Titan II (which, in case you were wondering, is a Windows Phone ) colleagues GSMArena  have made ​​an interesting comparison on the autonomy that involves models from various manufacturers with the three major mobile OS in the world (of course, Android, iPhone OS and the aforementioned system of Redmond). What emerges is a clear victory for you Razr Maxx, but not always as pronounced as you might think, and also the rear reserve some surprises, but we see in detail the results obtained, which for obvious reasons do not have many models available from we, as the exclusive U.S. territory.

Calling time

The first test is pretty self-explanatory, and if the Razr Maxx wins hands down is curious to note that the international version of the Galaxy notes you place chips in the second , albeit with less than 8 hours to the summit, but the Galaxy is well-LTE Notes 18 ° , with more than 4 hours of detachment between the two. The fault seems to be clear of the LTE radio, but of course this difference is worthy of a first study of placing too much responsibility only to the latter, which of course we can not do for lack of such a network in our country.

Web Browsing

The tests on web browsing, which was conducted under the Wi-Fi, reserves many surprises: first, the victory of the Razr Maxx is not as clear as you might think , indeed barely able to contain the HTC Radar , which in previous test was less than 25 °, but the ' iPhone 4S passes deftly from the nineteenth to the third position. Honorable Mention for the ' HTC V One , who took fourth place for the duration of the call that browsing. Even the Galaxy will not stop Note : this time is version LTE to win the round with 5h and 24min against 3h and 35min of the international model, and the fact that the test was conducted with Wi-Fi makes these results even more strange, and worthy of further investigation.

Play Video

In this field the model of Motorola back to set the pace , clearly separating the runner and reaffirming its leadership. International Notes The Galaxy back to overcome its LTE counterpart , while the HTC V One loses for the first time positions.

Bottom line: the range is one of the major problems for users, it certainly is not from companies that, with the exception of the one model of Motorola, have so far done nothing to surprise us in that sense. The results of the Razr Maxx are great because compared to the general mediocrity , but especially on the web browsing test shows that even in his case there would be so much more to do optimization . If the competition would shift a bit 'more in this field, rather than in the run up to n-th core, we would not mind it at all, otherwise the battery may become the classic thing that everyone complains about but no one strives to change.

HTC TITAN vs. Nokia Lumia 800: comparison of cells [Smartphone Video]

Less than a month ago, Microsoft and Nokia have announced two new products the Finnish manufacturer, which work on Windows Phone 7. The new flagship smartphone Nokia Lumia 800 have already compared the performance with the HTC TITAN , the current leader of the Taiwanese corporation. It's time to compare these products and the quality of video recording.

We remind that the main camera and HTC TITAN Nokia Lumia 800 has a resolution of 8 megapixels and can record 720p-video. The video resolution is limited in this case, only the power of the processors. Both smartphones installed Qualcomm MSM8255, however, the maximum frequency of the processor is 1.5 GHz TITAN, Nokia is at least 100 MHz. But put aside these differences, it does not affect video capture.

Advance is to say that Nokia's products have always been considered the best in the parameter "shooting videos and photos." So the expectations of the camera module for Nokia Lumia 800 of the public are very high. HTC, until recently lagged seriously. But from the Taiwanese manufacturer TITAN was to equip their smartphones medium to high priced new modules cameras from Sony and Samsung, as well as took up the revision of the software. The results are visible to the naked eye.

Video cameras on the quality of both is not bad. We can say that Nokia HTC wins in brightness and color saturation, though the difference is not very noticeable. But it is also possible to say that the video taken with HTC TITAN more natural color correct. But when shooting indoors HTC TITAN clearly outperforms the Nokia Lumia 800. The camera on the Taiwanese smartphone is much more responsive to changes in light of this it takes less than a second. Lumia chamber 800 to the same adjustment to the lighting necessary to spend a few seconds.

These test results seem a little bewildering. From the first Nokia product to Windows Phone 7 expected more, because he is important as a symbol of revival.